![]() Upper management may already be defensive or inquisitive about an undertaking. By performing sensitivity analysis, users can better understand what factors don't actually matter and can be removed from the model due to its lack of materiality. Overly complex models may make it hard to analyze the inputs. By performing different analytical iterations, management may catch mistakes in the original analysis. The original assumptions for the baseline analysis may have had some uncaught errors. Complex sensitivity analysis models educate users on different elements impacting a project this in turn informs members on the project what to be alert for or what to plan in advance for. This allows management to better understand what input variables may impact output variables. This includes what and how different external factors interact with a specific project or undertaking. International Journal of American Linguistics, 1962, 28, 25–43. Saporta (Eds.), “Problems in Lexicography”. Lexicographic definition in descriptive semantics. ![]() Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 86, 144–152. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976, 2, 58–68. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1965, 8, 627–633. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 573–605, Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 1–20. Meaning, memory structure and mental processes, Science, 1976, 192, 27–33. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 60, 376–383, Verbal satiation and changes in the intensity of meaning. Computational analysis of present day American English, Providence: Brown University Press, 1967. ![]() Cross-category structure in semantic memory. An old problem for the new psychosemantics: Synonymy, Psychological Bulletin, in press. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 176–184. A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. value ratings of 400 pairs of common adjectives, The Journal of Psychology, 1949, 27, 244–248. Synonymity, vividness, familiarity, and association. Alternative conceptions of semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 16, 505–518. Intercategory distance and categorization times: Effects of negative-probe related-ness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 68, 240–244.įillenbaum, S., & Rapoport, A. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 637–644.įillenbaum, S. A test of two measures of semantic satiation. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975, 1, 629–633.Ĭollins, A. The interrelationships of taxonomic categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 335–359.Ĭollen, A., Wickens, D. The language-as-a-fixed-effect fallacy A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976, 15, 103–107.Ĭlark, H. Subjective structures and operations in semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 1969, 80, 1–46.Ĭaramazza, A., Hersh, H., & Torgerson, W. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |